'LET US IN'

MEMBERS of the public have expressed anger and frustration after being denied entry to the Mitchells Plain Magistrate’s Court.

The restrictions were implemented following a shooting incident outside the court on 26 August 2025. 

According to the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, overcrowding at courts in the area has occasionally led to security threats and the compromise of sensitive information, prompting authorities to take precautionary measures.

In consultation with the Judiciary, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), and other stakeholders, the Court Security Committee temporarily restricted public access to manage crowds and protect everyone within the court precinct.

While the principle of open justice remains a cornerstone of South Africa’s legal system, officials said there are circumstances where access may be limited. 

Factors include the nature of the cases, particularly those involving gangsterism or organised crime; potential safety threats; public health concerns; and the need to protect witnesses, court users, and staff.

However, many community members argue that these measures are excessive. 

One resident said: “We have a right to see justice being served. Being told to stay outside doesn’t make us safe; it leaves us vulnerable.” 

Linda Jones, Court Watching Brief Member of the Mitchell's Plain United Residents' Association and the Public Relations Officer for the Mitchell's Plain Community Policing Forum, highlighted the ongoing dangers inside and outside the court. 

Jones said: “With all gangster cases appearing, there is automatically a need for more police inside the court, they need to make sure court attendees are safe, the staff are safe everyone, but this takes resources away from other duties.”

Samuel Modipane, spokesperson for the Department of Justice, said: “The Department reaffirms its commitment to transparency, fairness, and the constitutional right of access to justice.

“At the same time, the safety of court users, officials, and the public remains our top priority. Decisions to limit access are never taken lightly and are always made in consultation with the Judiciary and other relevant stakeholders.”

Authorities have pledged to continue working together to find a balance between open justice and public safety.