NAMED AND SHAMED

THE 51-year-old man accused of raping a nine-year-old girl from Hanover Park has been named and shamed, despite a bid for privacy. 

Igshaan Williams, a convicted child rapist, appeared in a packed Wynberg Magistrates Court on charges of human trafficking, rape, sexual assault and abduction last Friday. 

At his previous court appearance, the court heard that Williams who was released on parole in November 2024 after being found guilty of a similar crime which took place in 2005, when he raped a 10-year-old girl.

He now stands accused of luring a meisie into his house, drugging and raping her on Tuesday, 13 May. 

The girl was on her way to the madreesah when Williams gave her a R20 to buy milk for him. Upon returning Williams, instructed the girl to put the milk down in the kitchen, when she did this Williams turned around and locked the door. 

He then fed her bread causing her to become drowsy and that is when the alleged rape took place.

After checking CCTV cameras in the area, the girl was found hours later, in the accused's yard, in a curled-up position. 

On Friday, the media made an application to take pictures of the accused.

Williams opposed the application citing that he had the right to privacy and to be protected. His legal aid also indicated that her client was scared that his family would be treated differently if his identity was made known.

The State however argued saying that Williams’ case was in the public’s interest and noted that the community has been present protesting outside the court.

He also referred to the high profile case of Henry Van Breda where the media made an application in the public's interest to record proceedings.

The prosecutor said: “We understand that the accused has the right to a fair trial but then there is also freedom of expression.”

Magistrate Sharon Mthimunye agreed with the State stating: “It is correct that you have the right to a fair trial and the right to privacy, however, I am inclined to agree with the prosecutor. You have not placed any evidence of prejudice before the court.

“It is indeed so that the public has interest in this matter, so to prevent the community from taking the law into their own hands and for them to see that the court does take their opinion into consideration, I am satisfied that you will not be prejudiced.”

Outside of court, angry community member Sumaya Gilfelleon wanted to know what the accused meant by protection and privacy.

She said: “He wasn't worried about the child’s privacy, he wasn't worried about protecting her, he even drugged and abducted her, what privacy does he want?”

The case was postponed until 25 July 2025 for further investigation.